Category Archives: Front Page
MEMO TO THE HISTORY CHANNELS….
I enjoy the information you present from time to time. Quite frankly I am a history buff. But come on History Channel Executives, Do you really think I think that all Ancient History Ethiopians, All Ancient History Egyptians, All Ancient History Libyans, All Ancient History Israelites, All persons from all countries in Africa, and ALL persons in the Bible looked like Charlton Heston and Elizabeth Taylor, and White Europeans?
We are talking about Africa. We are talking about that portion of the world where Ancient Egyptians built the pyramids and the Sphinx and great building and monuments which still baffle modern day scientists and engineers. We are talking about that portion of the world where the Bible takes place. Not the convenience of saying the Middle East. The inconvenience of saying the Continent of AFRICA. Yes AFRICA CONTINENT…where Jesus and Moses and Solomon and David and Ruth and Esther and Mary Magdalene AND thousands more biblical persons lived. For you see History Channel executives, in addition to a spiritual book for Christians, the Bible is also an Ancient History Book. Of course, well before Europe was discovered, there was the continent of Africa. Contrary to the belief you foster, those countries which make up Africa were not inhabited by blue-eyed White Europeans. Those persons which many of us study, have studied, and read about daily in the bible were not blue-eyed White Europeans…irrespective of the images in stained-glass windows in many Christian Churches. Those persons by today's standards were Black. (The stained-glass windows are another story.) Next time use this disclaimer before some of your so-called history programming and you can use this copy if you like. You have my permission.
"The following program is historically inaccurate. Although our researchers confirmed these events take place in countries on the continent of Africa and near the continent of Africa, and although we have confirmed many of the persons portrayed in the program were historically Black, we have chosen to to show them as White Anglo Saxons to appeal to Racist White Christian Evangelicals so we can maintain their viewership and in the process make money. That especially includes the image of Jesus. We do not want to give any ideas to dark-skinned persons of the world. So we choose to purposely lie about History."
The Struggle Continues. RLHSR.
That’s right, the image was taken from Venezuela, not Baltimore. But for those who accepted Fox’s rendition of the story uncritically, the image became burned into their minds as being a scene of devastation in Baltimore.
On April 27th, local FOX13 claimed the photo of the fires burning everything except the golden arches at McDonalds was “Baltimore In Flames.”
Reverb Nation notes that one viewer noticed the image and placed it right away. They thought the image looked familiar, and pointed out that the story on the CVS burning was not Baltimore at all.
The Imgur user said: “Now I understand why people mock Fox news so much…”
Just imagine if Fox hadn’t been called out on this? How many more stations would continue to run it as an actual image of Baltimore in flames? Just imagine how much else they are lying to us about!
The Struggle Continues. RLHSR.
Now that the 150th anniversary of Reconstruction is upon us, the National Park Service is trying to figure out how to appropriately mark this incredibly important period in American history—a period that the nation has done little to recognize up to this point.
While the South is covered with Civil War plaques seemingly on every other corner celebrating bloody battles, there’s virtually no public recognition that Reconstruction even existed—no plaques, no National Park Service sites, no acknowledgement. Just the remnants of racism and the dastardly work of President Andrew Johnson.
But the National Park Service is trying to change that. Over the next year, the park service will ask historians, its own staff members, state historical societies, and the general public about the best sites and methods to capture Reconstruction’s history, according to Gregory P. Downs, an associate professor of history at City College and the Graduate Center of the City University of New York and the author of After Appomattox: Military Occupation and the Ends of War, and Kate Masur, an associate professor of history at Northwestern University and the author of An Example for All the Land: Emancipation and the Struggle Over Equality in Washington, D.C.
Downs and Masur wrote a piece on The Atlantic website revealing that they will be assisting the park service in determining how best to commemorate Reconstruction. The park service has also commissioned a handbook on Reconstruction that will soon be available in parks.
In their piece, Downs and Masur explain that the temporary loss of power during the period was so difficult for whites to digest that historians created a falsified narrative about that slice of history.
After Emancipation, the United States did extend the vote to Black men, and consequently in the South Black men were elected to Congress, state legislatures, and crucial local offices such as sheriffs and assessors. With the influence of these newly enfranchised Black people, new state governments created public schools and hospitals, and Black people and their white allies founded colleges, churches, and benevolent organizations, according to Downs and Masur.
But horror and bloodshed for the Black community soon followed, as white Southerners lashed out violently in bloody campaigns of terror, preventing African Americans from voting, killing thousands of freed people and raping untold numbers of Black women, all to reestablish control. By the end of the century, Jim Crow was in place and the Supreme Court in 1896’s Plessy v. Ferguson decision ruled that Black men didn’t have any rights a white man was bound to respect.
Throughout the early 20th century, as recounted by Downs and Masur, historians pressed the case that Reconstruction had been a disastrous mistake and created clear cut villains in the cartoonish Black Southerners holding offices they didn’t deserve, corrupt white Northern carpetbaggers moving south to take what didn’t belong to them, and tyrannical Republican politicians who oversaw an era of unjust, unconstitutional federal intervention. Altogether, this rewriting of history was used as a justification for the horrific racist policies of Jim Crow.
Not until the 1960s did historians begin to get the story of Reconstruction right, dispelling the myth of “negro rule” and showing how difficult it was for African Americans to get candidates elected to major offices.
“Against claims that African Americans emerged from slavery unprepared to live independently, historians have unearthed the wealth of institutions and cultural resources that people of African descent developed in slavery and cultivated after emancipation,” Downs and Masur wrote.
But the period still hasn’t gotten its proper due. The Parks Service is attempting to change that. Downs and Masur point out that the agency of late has been willing to tackle sensitive subjects, developing sites commemorating Japanese Internment during World War II, and the massacre of hundreds of Cheyenne and Arapaho people at Sand Creek by Coloradans enrolled in the U.S. Army, in addition to Civil War memorials that now include the roles of Black soldiers, slaves, and freed people.
“Identifying those sites and creating a framework for public engagement with Reconstruction cannot smooth out the complexity and travails of the era,” Downs and Masur wrote, “but it can be a part of fulfilling the Park Service’s mission of helping Americans grapple with this nation’s history, a challenge that in the end means not just celebrating its victories but also remembering its tragedies and asking serious questions about defeats and wrong turns.”May 1, 2015 | Posted by
Enough with the appeasing hand wringing about "Why are they rioting?" Leave most ministers in their pulpits. Leave most Black elected officials in their Ivory Towers. Do you only now realize there is a crisis when there is a crisis everyday in Black America? White America wants to trot you out as so-called peacemakers, but what peace are you making? When do you ever speak up about Racism, and point fingers at White America.
No one condones violence and no one is expected to defend the taking of property. But no one condones the taking of life.
Yet we see it happening everyday…Baltimore is Jacksonville and New York and Ferguson and Chicago and Washington DC and Orlando and Miami and America USA.
No one wants to deal with the racism of America or the rising militaristic nature of a police force yet we see that everyday too when Blacks—American Blacks—are killed with impunity.
We are victims many times over.
We die in the custody of police in the back of a police car and handcuffed and somehow someway we shot ourselves and committed suicide.
We hold our hands up and we are shot and killed because we looked menacing.
We run away from a car for whatever reason and a officer takes careful aim and shoots us 4 times in the back killing us as if running is a reason to die.
We run away on a bicycle and we are shot in the back killing us.
We are choked to death while in custody of the police.
We maliciously have our spine severed and we later die while in custody of the police.
We are shot at point blank range and killed in an erroneous drug raid gone wrong.
We see our children killed by police while they are sitting in our living room in another police raid gone wrong.
The willing allies of these killing are the media and the press who are always willing to shine a camera at violence but not willing to discuss and point fingers at law enforcement and how the sheer nature of government today is complicit in What is Wrong With America.
You don't want Americans to have health care. You treat it as a scourge instead of a necessary resource to save lives. Yet you can sell guns to take lives at a moment's notice …justify their use and deadly consequences… and call it protection. You erroneously think health care helps Blacks more than Whites.
You kidnap us from Africa…you work us for free in a free labor economy…you then say later that "You Are Free". And when I ask you Free From What and Free With What, you laugh. When I ask about reparations for the hundreds of years you stole money from me and my family and my ancestors, you laugh.
Supposedly we are a nation of those who respect Freedoms, yet the first freedom you always want to take from Blacks is the freedom to vote without shackles and chains. And you take pride in denying Blacks the right to vote.
When Black people correctly charge, accuse and indict you for centuries of brutality, you compare us to infants throwing a tantrum.
When we use terms that adequately reflect the imbalance of power between whites and Black people as well as the terrorism that typifies how whites relate to Black people, you say we are whiners.
When we complain about the Criminal "Injustice" System, you accuse us of playing the "race card" which we are because the system smacks of racism.
You also promote the absurd theory that “sensitivity training” can rehabilitate racists. Not when Racism is American Born and Bred.
Then you love to use the term Racial Reconciliation. Reconciliation is the restoration of friendly relations. During what era have whites and Black people enjoyed friendly, non-exploitative relations?
Also understand that even while we use the term White Privilege it is a misnomer. White Privilege conveniently focuses attention on the benefits whites derive from racism, not the mandatory white conduct that sustains a racist empire. Let's call it White pathology along with White deeds and White actions – not privileges – which void Black life and extinguish our very existence.
Once again America, you can sit with your thumb up your Ass and pretend it is only a problem with the Black Savages on the Street…and you can call all the Black and White Intellectuals you want to analyze the problem…and we can all the ministers of all faiths to have Interfaith prayer sessions everyday …but until and unless America decides it wants to something about the way it treats its Black citizens, and have since we were kidnapped and brought to these shores, toil and strife will continue. Just another time and another place. America will have NO REST until respect for Human Dignity and the sanctity of a Black Life is at hand.
The Struggle Continues. RLHSR.
The problem is that white people see racism as conscious hate, when racism is bigger than that. Racism is a complex system of social and political levers and pulleys set up generations ago to continue working on the behalf of whites at other people’s expense, whether whites know/like it or not.
Racism is an insidious cultural disease. It is so insidious that it doesn’t care if you are a white person who likes black people; it’s still going to find a way to infect how you deal with people who don’t look like you. Yes, racism looks like hate, but hate is just one manifestation. Privilege is another. Access is another. Ignorance is another. Apathy is another. And so on. So while I agree with people who say no one is born racist, it remains a powerful system that we’re immediately born into. It’s like being born into air: you take it in as soon as you breathe. It’s not a cold that you can get over.
There is no anti-racist certification class. It’s a set of socioeconomic traps and cultural values that are fired up every time we interact with the world. It is a thing you have to keep scooping out of the boat of your life to keep from drowning in it. I know its hard work, but it’s the price you pay for owning everything. SCOTT WOODS
If that ain't a Mouthful!!! The Struggle Continues. RLHSr.
"WHAT CAN AMERICA DO ABOUT RACISM?" I was asked.
My comments are always the same:
I define racism and the American Institution of Racism as the White Privilege Knowledge that Whites feel they are superior to Blacks. And because they have population numbers which places them in control of this country, Whites do impose their will on Blacks, deny Blacks fundamental rights and opportunities guaranteed in the Constitution, and to a lesser degree in the Declaration of Independence, simply because THEY CAN. The history of this country is a litany of their doing just that, and they continue to do so. They set laws and policies and circumstances because they are in control. That is the nature of Racism. Racism is also a system of inequality —SOCIAL, POLITICAL AND FINANCIAL— based on skin color. Again because of White Control or Apartheid American Style. There is no such thing as Black Racism because Blacks are not in control and because we cannot demand anything or impose our will on anyone.
Racism is really White America's problem. Racism will not change unless and until Whites want Racism to change. Blacks—SOME BLACKS— will fight Racism until they can no longer take a breath on this earthly plane. Which is what we have done and continue to do. Other Blacks think if they mind their racial manners, act racially polite, do what Whites tell them to do, eat their Wheaties, eat their Spinach, show Whites they are Good and Honest and Pure, show them what good Niggers they are, and those actions will somehow make a difference. To those Blacks, they need to get their heads out of their ASSES because they you are only fooling themselves. We get a constant panorama of these same Handkerchief Blacks everyday on FOX and more often than not on local news stations.
Whites ONLY can do something about Racism and its root causes in these As Yet United States of America, when and if they choose. Until then, the Battle Lines stay drawn. And understand, the battle is never easy and it will not get any easier … But …the battle which has been fought since Slavery will continue as long as Racism continues wearing its cloak of hatred and virulent violence and obstinate stupidity. Those who do not understand are the ones in serious trouble.
The Struggle Continues. RLHSR.
This is an article written by Allen Clifton and it appeared in forwardprogressives.com April 3, 2015. Great Stuff.
"It’s no secret that the vast majority of Republicans absolutely loathe President Obama. While some of it has to do with racism (especially among the tea party ranks), a lot of it stems from their jealousy of his presidency. George W. Bush is going to go down as one of the most disastrous presidents in our nation’s history. Following his exit from the White House, he basically had one last shot at redemption: a peaceful and stable Iraq. Well, with the rise of ISIS – due in large part to the Iraq War destabilizing the entire region – that “dream” is over. Not only is Iraq plagued with horrific violence right now, but much of the Middle East has been engulfed in utter chaos because of the destabilization of the region following Bush’s war. But even going beyond Bush’s failures internationally, his economic polices were an epic disaster here at home.
Near the beginning of his presidency he professed that his tax cuts would balance the budget within a decade; instead, they nearly doubled our national debt during his eight years and his policies sent this country toward the worst economic recession in nearly a century. Enter President Obama six years ago.
Obama was tasked with the unenviable task of becoming president in the middle of a complete economic meltdown, two wars and a country spiraling out of control. And despite what you might hear from the GOP, Fox News or the rest of the conservative media, this president has been one of the most successful in our nation’s history. That fact really ticks off Republicans because they’ve done just about everything they can to sabotage his presidency, yet they’ve failed at nearly every turn. Not only that, but he’s done things that Bush could have only dreamed of doing.
In just six years, coming off the worst recession since the Great Depression, President Obama has already created more jobs than Bush did during his entire eight years in Washington. He also created more jobs in 2014 than Bush did during any year he was in office. On top of job growth and economic recovery, President Obama has been infinitely more successful than Bush when it comes to international affairs. It took Obama two years to do what Bush couldn’t do in nearly eight – that is, order the successful killing of Osama bin Ladin. History will always show that Barack Obama was president when the world’s most wanted terrorist was found and killed, and Republicans can’t stand to think about that fact.
Then even when you look at this nuclear deal with Iran, it’s something Republicans want no part of – because their ideology really isn’t advanced enough to even fathom using diplomacy to try to avoid war. To Republicans, Iran is nothing more than a war they’ve yet to fight. When it comes to matters such as these, the only “answer” they typically have is “let’s start a war.” The Iraq War was a perfect example. Sure, it was easy to send troops to the region, invade the country and remove Saddam Hussein from power – but then what? Well, the Bush administration clearly didn’t have a clue.
Part of their selling point for the war was that it would be over in a matter of months. We even saw the embarrassing spectacle of Bush landing on an aircraft carrier in a flight suit declaring “mission accomplished” just a few weeks after the war began. The truth is, they had no idea what they were doing, how to handle it or any sort of exit strategy once the entire mess was started. Could you imagine if President Obama did that exact same thing? Hell, the conservative media flips out if he doesn’t salute Marines properly; imagine if he landed on an aircraft carrier in a flight suit prior to over 4,000 American eventually dying in a war that he promised would only last a few weeks. But because he’s exhausting diplomatic efforts with Iran (along with many of our allies) to avoid another disaster like the one Bush caused, Republicans are up in arms, using all sorts of “this will lead to the end of our great nation” ridiculous rhetoric. Basically because the conservative vision for our future is so simplistic and small, they can’t grasp the “bigger picture” that President Obama sees. All the while, he’s taken a strong stance on Israel to show that we won’t let another nation dictate to us what we will or won’t do with our foreign policy – something Republicans seem far too spineless to ever do. It’s not that President Obama isn’t loyal to our ally, but it’s possible to be loyal to a nation while still thinking that nation’s leader is pompous ass who’s trying to have proxy control over your international affairs. Though when you look at how Republicans have behaved these last few weeks concerning Israel, one has to wonder, to what country do they really pledge their loyalty?
I’ve never seen a time in our history where an entire political party showed more respect to a foreign leader than they do to our own president. But the bottom line is, President Obama has owned Republicans his entire time in office. Despite their best efforts, our economy has still grown and our unemployment continues to fall. In nearly every major legislative battle, from the government shutdown; to the Affordable Care Act; to the Keystone XL pipeline; to raising taxes on the rich; to the debt ceiling; and even funding for the Department of Homeland Security – Obama has won every battle.
This president will go down as one of the most accomplished in our nation’s history, and that fact drives Republicans crazy. So, while Republicans will undoubtedly always hate Barack Obama, deep down many are just jealous. He’s what they wished George W. Bush could have been, but never was – a successful president."
Nothing to add. The Struggle Continues. RLHSR.
Read more at: http://www.forwardprogressives.com/republicans-mad-obama-president-wished-bush-been/
Read more at: http://www.forwardprogressives.com/republicans-mad-obama-president-wished-bush-been/
DUKE IS AS RACIST AS ANY TWI, Traditional White Institution. So save the indignant attitude that it happened at Duke if you attended Duke…or any other TWI. We have seen it happen over and over and over again at PWI—Predominantly White Institutions— because racism exists there also and wherever the American Institution of Racism exists, you have episodes of racial hatred. Duke's Vice President of Student Affairs Larry Moneta said in 2013 that racism isn't an "overt violation" of Duke University's code of student conduct; it's just "boorish and foolish". Boorish and Foolish eh? He is still Duke's Vice President for Student Affairs.
And please do not tell me how millennials—both Black and White—will make a difference. Many millennials do not know how to address and deal with racism. They still contend we are in a Post-Racial Society. And please…stop quoting Dr. King's statement… "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character" …as a wedge against doing what is right for centuries to end racism and discrimination. Dr. King knew we could never get to the content of character because White America would never get beyond the color of Black skin. Affirmative action was a start and then White America created Reverse Discrimination. What a real pathetic joke!
So when these instances occur at so-called prestigious White Institutions of Higher Education, and even the non-prestigious White Institutions of Higher Education, Blacks are not surprised. We rather expect them. After all Racism is as American as Apple Pie draped in the American Flag.
The Struggle Continues. RLHSR.
Mr. Mayor…Let me direct these comments to you.
When you ran for mayor in 2011, according to some, you indicated you would not have a political administration and you would not deal in partisan politics since you had both Republicant and Democrat support.? Never did understand that but so be it because after all, you did run as a Democrat. In 2012, you were asked by a reporter if you would support and campaign for President, since you were inexplicably absent when President Obama came to town to campaign for re-election. You indicated you would not, and repeated again the nonsense about not dealing in partisan politics. I could not understand your lack of motivation or your logic since he was a Democrat and you were a Democrat and Democrats went to the polls in good numbers to support you against your Republicant opposition. And true to your word, not only were you absent when President Obama came to town but you did not even extend political courtesies to Mrs. Obama when she came to town to campaign for her husband, The President of the United States. In fact she came to town twice and you were a no-show both times. And let me remind you she IS the First Lady of the United States. I considered it an insult. And like I have said to you Mr. Mayor, Blacks might like you, but they definitely LOVE President Obama.
There was a rumor that said in exchange for supporting you, the Republicant Big Boys got you to commit to not support President Obama. As I said that was a nasty rumor and let's leave it at that. So you are elected Mayor of Jacksonville as a Democrat …You do not campaign for President Obama also a Democrat…but you went to the inauguration of Republicant Governor Rick Scott and in a TV interview YOU sing his praises as if he was the second coming. So what did you gain in return? Nothing absolutely Nothing. And to add the proverbial insult to injury, YOUR Governor Scott endorsed your opponent as you are running for re-election. The Governor apparently thinks you are not worth a blankety- blank or he is really playing partisan politics by endorsing a Republicant over a Democrat. The kind you said YOU could not play when you justified NOT CAMPAIGNING FOR PRESIDENT OBAMA RUNNING FOR RE-ELECTION AGAINST MITT ROMNEY..
I am certainly not a fan of Republicants nor what they stand for. But if you are re-elected, it will happen in spite of yourself. You have literally and figuratively played a terrible hand of political cards, and you have not endeared yourself to the community who had so much hope for your administration. I cannot abide political stupidity or political naivete, but I have to admit Mr. Mayor, in this instance, you take the political cake. Good Luck. You'll need it.
The Struggle Continues. RLHSR.
SOME OF YOU WHITE FOLKS WILL LEARN ABOUT TRYING TO LECTURE ME ON RACISM. The following is an exchange with me and one of my Facebook "friends". I will black out his name for the time being. I posted an article about Social Conservatives seeking to find the right candidate to unite behind and the article had a picture of Ted Cruz.
I then said on the comments above the article:
I posted with the article the following: "The Hot Mess of Right Wingnut White Anglo Saxon Protestant Christian Evangelical Racist Republicants trying to ensure another Black Man or a Woman will not darken…literally and figuratively…the Oval Office in the White House and its living quarters."
My "Facebook Friend" responded:
Are you insinuating that Cruz is a racist because he is a "Protestant Evangelical Christian Republican"? I'm guessing not, but the insinuation is there. You're a historian, and you know that Martin Luther King, Jr's father was all that, but not a racist. And so is his niece. And it was a Republican Pres that established MLK Day as a National Holiday. And should we list the 1050's Democratic leaders (some members of the KKK) who opposed Civil Rights and Voting Rights legislation? And what about the Repubican Pres that pushed for equality in both the military and housing? I happened to be a Protestant Evangelical Christian Republican (and white), who, by the way, voted for more D's than R's in this recent election. IT appears to me that NEITHER party is a bastion of morality and justice, and both need to be called out on this problem.
This is my reply:
I guess you are giving me the typical White man's lecture on what Blacks should be grateful for. White privilege I presume. Apparently you do not know me that well. If you did, you would know I do not insinuate anything. Rafael "Ted" Cruz is a racist because he embraces racist philosophy and the ideology of a Republican political party of racists. Many Blacks of days gone by were Republicans ONLY because it was the party of Lincoln. That was then. Many of those same Blacks would not claim any membership in this remnant of Lincoln's Party which wallows in core racist attitudes and supports any effort designed to discriminate against Blacks.
Your President Ronald Reagan did not establish Martin Luther King's birthday as a National Holiday. He simply signed the bill. Many of you Republican…I guess you are a Republican…bow at Reagan's throne as if he was some extraordinary president. If fact, he was a horrible president who spent more day vacationing than any other president in recent memory. Reagan reluctantly signed the bill for the Martin Luther King Holiday not because he wanted to but because he basically had to. You need to go back to the historical drawing board. No Republican President "pushed for equality in both the military and housing." I have no idea where you got that tidbit from unless like many Whites you make up history as you go along …OR…conveniently forget other portions of history that is too embarrassing for you to admit. BTW.. This is the same Ronald Reagan who publicly said he would have voted against the Civil Rights Bill and the Voting Rights Bill. You remind me so much of Whites who protesteth racism too much. It makes no difference to me how many D's and R's you voted for. That is like telling me some of my best friends are Black. Neither impresses me at all. Let me make this clear…Rafael "Ted" Cruz is a foreign born racist U. S. Senator from Texas and the Republican Party is a haven for Racists.
The Struggle Continues. RLHSR.